Tweets by @1MaV3RiCk

Thursday, September 20, 2012

ARE SMARTPHONES ALIENATING US FROM US?

When did phones first become "smart"? One would say since RIM introduced BlackBerrys! Those were just enhanced phones, capable of handling mail and instant messaging (which is not very smart). But come 2007, a company which then, had just claimed the crown for music players in the market, introduced a truly unthinkable experience in the name of a 'Phone'! Ever since, there has been an extensive and exponential growth in the smartphone market. With smartphone shipments touching 472 million units worldwide (statistics via Gartner) in 2011, one should stand, stop and pause to think, and analyze how the smartphones have changed our ways.

An instrument which brings seamless usage of maps, social networking, news, games, etc is causing us to get distracted from the world, it gets tougher to lift those heads out of their 4-inch shiny screens. For example before any of us had a maps app, we would ask around and get to a place we didn't know, but now, thanks to largely google's and various others map apps, that form of interaction has been completely lost, also there are researchers telling us that we may impair our sense of recognition and memorization of various places and cities because of these apps.
Another interesting fact, for some reason, smartphone users are becoming more skittish about having personal conversations in public, it is a widely known fact, that people now talk about more sensitive topics (whether relating to themselves or otherwise) over SMS or IM services. Why? What happened to those times where we spoke to each other about our problems face-to-face?
We have reduced our entertainment needs to gaming and watching movies on small 4-inch glossy screens, what happened to the good old ways, "Hey! You want to go for the new Spiderman movie"? The extensive usage of instant messaging has put literature greats to shame, we shorten our sentences (so that we do not have to type for long) which often leaves the reader confused (unless he or she is familiar with your style of saying things in short).
Another very disturbing and very noticeable thing, the children today instead of arguing about sports, classwork, knowledge about their surrounding world in general, quarrel over which smartphone is the best. Its one thing to debate over a topic temporarily and another to come back everyday and talk about the same thing, its a sign of obsession.
Along with smartphones came along a new era in information security, while this feature put paranoid corporate heads to ease, it raised paranoia in the general public, for example, if a friend of mine whilst using my phone notices I have a lock code, it unnecessarily raises brows, this is still mild, but when a couple in a relationship for example notices this, he or she gets freaked out with questions like "why is he or she hiding stuff from me?" "Is he or she cheating on me?" running through his or her mind, its very unsettling! With improved security, there is newer version of doubt created in the minds.
Then there is social networking, before the smartphone era, people used to first share news (good or bad) with the people they regularly meet, then with people who were a little far away over the phone and then the news spread slowly to farther places, but today? Even the tiniest bit of news about our personal lives first finds a spot on the "walls" or "timelines" of various online social sites as "status updates", have we lost the essence of actual physical communication?

All I want to say in this post is that, yes smartphones have indeed made an impact on our lives, rather quite a positive one I would say, but as it has been said before I will like to reassert the fact that 'too much of anything is not good' (very cliched I know, but its true). With this is sleepless obsession over smartphones, we are descending into anarchy and a state of the world being filled with tiny, shiny screens. Eventually this madness will subside, but the question is what lasting impact and damage will it do to our social lives before it mellows down? Only time will tell! Of course on the other hand smartphone manufacturers will not want such stories to catch steam as there is a whole $300-$500 billion market for them, out there! Like statutory warnings on cigarette packs ("Smoking kills") a mild warning should be printed on those smartphone boxes as well, 'Use responsibly!'.

Friday, September 7, 2012

WhatsApp vs BlackBerry Messenger

In a world where short message service (SMS) has become obsolete (almost), instant messaging (IM) is the new way to communicate. With various IM service providers on the rise, two IM service providers have emerged as the leaders in this, yet unfinished race. They, most noticeably being BlackBerry Messenger and WhatsApp (written in alphabetical order). BlackBerry Messenger being the grandpa of IM it wasn't a surprise that it managed to hold on to its user base. But they lost that edge of exclusivity ('I'm buying a BlackBerry smartphone because it has BlackBerry Messenger') the moment WhatsApp became available for almost all smartphones rather almost all operating systems being run on those smartphones (iOS, Android, Blackberry, Windows Phone, Symbian and S40). Now the question that arises is, 'Which one out of these two will eventually win the race?'

BlackBerry Messenger:

Pros:
1) Encrypted messaging service & high reliability.
2) Choose BBM display picture and status.
3) Send and receive messages with unlimited length.
4) Share photos, videos and more with multiple contacts at once.
5) Real time confirmations of delivered and read messages.
6) Send music files.
7) Create and join groups.
8) Share location.
9) Is free (but requires a dedicated BlackBerry plan).

Cons:
1) Limited to only BlackBerry devices as it requires a BlackBerry PIN number.
2) Requires you to subscribe to a dedicated BlackBerry internet plan, because it uses the BIS as a channel of communication.


WhatsApp Messenger:

Pros:
1) Encrypted messaging service (new feature in the latest version).
2) Cross Platform (iOS, Android, Blackberry, Windows Phone, Symbian and S40) as it generates a user account using the cell phone number and uses a MD-5 hashed, reversed version of the IMEI of the phone as password.
3) Choose display pictures from your photo gallery and status updates.
4) Send and receive messages with unlimited length.
5) Share photos, videos and more with contacts.
6) Create and join groups.
7) Share location.
8) Real time confirmations of delivered and read messages.
9) Can be bought with a one time payment of $0.99 on the Appstore and Play Store and for BlackBerry, Windows Phone and Symbian devices its free for the 1st year of usage.
10) Does not require a dedicated data plan for WhatsApp, works on the regular internet plan.

Cons:
1) Groups are limited to 20 contacts presently.
2) May not match the BBM in reliability, various issues of security holes have been made public by various hackers.

Verdict: At present it looks like there is no clear winner, but WhatsApp has the edge over BlackBerry for the sole reason that it supports various platforms. In the long run BlackBerry may lose its grip over its IM user base, because of 3 reasons; One is that the world is going gaga over the plethora of smartphones available in the market (almost all of which WhatsApp supports). Two Research in Motion is not staying true to its name, other smartphone vendors like Apple Inc. and Samsung are reinventing the smartphone with newer features with every new iteration of their devices, which make the BlackBerry smartphones a little less attractive deal for even their corporate clients. And third (being last but not the least) a new player has emerged by the name of iMessage (which is bundled into the iOS, only iOS5 onwards) it will take time till it catches up, but we cannot underestimate its potential.
So if RIM wants to keep is IM user base or even better, make it grow they may have to do something new, like license its messenger service to other smartphone vendors (desperate times call for desperate measures).




Sunday, August 26, 2012

Apple's $1Billion victory over Samsung!

The verdict in the ongoing patent battle between Apple and Samsung in San Jose court swung largely in favor of Apple Inc. Samsung was asked to pay Apple $1.05billion as compensation damages. Apple will now file for permanent injunction on the sales of Samsung's smartphones which infringe on patents that belong to Apple.

After the verdict, this is what both the companies had to say about the ruling:

Apple's spokesperson Katie Cotton: We are grateful to the jury for their service and for investing the time to listen to our story and we were thrilled to be able to finally tell it. The mountain of evidence presented during the trial showed that Samsung's copying went far deeper than we even knew. The lawsuits Apple and Samsung were about much more than patents or money. They were about values. At Apple, we value originality and innovation and pour our lives into making the best products on earth. We make these products to delight the customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy. We applaud the court for finding Samsung's behavior willful and for sending a loud and clear message that stealing isn't right.

Samsung issued this statement: Today's verdict should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer, it will lead to fewer choices, less innovation and potentially higher prices. It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies. Companies have the right to choices, and they know what they are buying when they purchase Samsung products. This is not the final word in this case or in the battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple's claims. Samsung will continue to innovate and offer choices for the consumer.

Apple obviously being grateful. And Samsung being the typical loser.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Was Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) actually ready to go public? 

After being the most traded stock in a day (on the day of the listing) Facebook's stock price has taken a beating. Facebook's stock price is down 50% from its listing price of $38.

An article in the Wall St. Cheat Sheet said, "Early Facebook investor and director Peter Thiel earned $396 million after selling 20.06 million shares in the company after the IPO lockup period ended. Following the sale of, of 640.1 million worth stock in the public offering, Thiel's proceeds hit more than $1 billion. He now has around 8 million Facebook shares, down from his 44 million shares prior to the listing."

Another article stated how Mark Zuckerberg lost $9 billion of his net worth, in the recent downturn of his company's stock price.

What is the reason for such a dismal performance on the stock market, by a social networking site which is expected to touch 1 billion users by September? Why does something so popular like Facebook go bad on the exchange?

There could be various reasons for why Facebook is not doing that well on the exchange:

1) Facebook does not have a strong business model. Agreed its one of the most used avenue for advertising, but how many people actually go on to even click the advertisement? When the social networking site was fresh, advertisements did work because it was a very new concept about 4-5 years back. But now, people do not click on advertisements that often. And if advertisements do not work, advertisers won't be willing to spend such hefty sums of cash and remember Facebook earns a maximum amount of its revenue from advertisements.

2) Why Facebook's mobile application, adds to the problem? Desktop users are also now not that interested in ads, and when it comes to the mobile application, the biggest disadvantage is that there are no advertisements on the Facebook's dedicated application for smartphones. And a recent statistics released pegs the percentage of mobile users at 64%.

3) Not many people take Facebook credits seriously.

So the final question that comes to our mind, was Facebook actually ready? Or was it a mistime? Unless Facebook comes up with a half decent solution for advertisements it will have to make sure that advertisers feel that the money they are investing is being put to good use.    

Thursday, August 16, 2012

Anticipating the new iPhone:

According to recent statistics, the worldwide smartphone sales fell 2.3% this quarter, in anticipation of the new iPhone. So we should expect a huge surge in iPhone sales, than what we usually see after the release. The people waiting for the new iPhone are surely going to be in for a treat.
A reminder of what is expected to feature in the new iteration of Apple's new iPhone:

1) 4.0 inch screen (diagonally)
2) 4G- LTE support (reminder it is expected to be a world phone, as it will support LTE on worldwide networks, because of the imminent deal with ChinaMobile,
3) Smaller dock connector (9 pin)
4) A new nano-sim.
5) iOS6.
6) And other surprise features by Apple.

 Let's hope that the new iPhone lives up to our expectations!